PCG Worldwide Blog

Posts Tagged ‘sustainability’

Hydro to Lead Global Renewables Growth through 2035

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

  WASHINGTON 9/28/11 (PennWell) — A U.S. agency report predicts hydroelectric power will constitute 55 percent of the renewable energy added globally through 2035.

 International Energy Outlook 2011, by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), said renewable energy sources are the fastest growing sources of electricity generation globally. It predicts, from 2008 to 2035, world renewable energy use for electricity generation will grow an average of 3.1 percent per year and the renewable share of world electricity generation will increase from 19 percent in 2008 to 23 percent in 2030.

 ”Of the 4.6 trillion kilowatt-hours of new renewable generation added over the projection period, 2.5 trillion kilowatt-hours (55 percent) is attributed to hydroelectric power and 1.3 trillion kilowatt-hours (27 percent) to wind,” the report said.

 Although renewables have positive environmental and energy security attributes, EIA said most renewable technologies other than hydroelectricity are not able to compete economically with fossil fuels during the projection period, except in a few regions or niche markets. It said government policies or incentives often provide the primary economic motivation for construction of renewables generation facilities.

 Greatest hydro growth in developing countries

 The report noted the greatest increase in hydroelectric growth is outside the developed countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

 ”In the OECD nations, most of the hydroelectric resources that are both economical to develop and also meet environmental regulations already have been exploited,” EIA said. “With the exceptions of Canada and Turkey, there are few large-scale hydroelectric projects planned for the future.”

 In the non-OECD countries, hydropower is expected to be the predominant source of renewable energy growth. This is due to mid- to large-scale hydroelectric plants to be completed in China, India, Brazil, and a number of nations in Southeast Asia, including Malaysia and Vietnam.

 The report predicted world hydropower generation will increase to 5.6 trillion kWh by 2035 from 3.1 trillion kWh in 2008. Wind generation is expected to increase to 1.4 trillion kWh in 2035 from 210 billion kWh in 2008. Other renewables are expected to increase to 1.1 trillion kWh in 2035 from 331 billion kWh in 2008.

Total world net electricity generation is expected to increase 84 percent, the report said, to 35.2 trillion kWh in 2035 from 19.1 trillion kWh in 2008. Greatest growth is expected in non-OECD countries where a large amount of potential demand remains unsatisfied. 

Solar Energy Policy for 2012 Budget

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

12 August 2011

An initial budget draft from the House indicates big cuts to solar funding, leaving the US CSP sector anxious over premature withdrawal of support.

By Bob Moser, Americas correspondent, CSP Today

The Department of Energy will likely face budget cuts for the coming fiscal year, with legislators looking anywhere they can for federal savings.

An initial draft from the House indicated big cuts to solar funding, prompting some in the industry to question whether CSP may lose crucial federal support before it fully finds its legs, NREL and DOE sources say patience is key with a budgeting process that is often as long as it is unpredictable.

The House Appropriations Committee offered a budget in June that would reduce funding in Fiscal Year 2012 by about 25% for the DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Within that budget, DOE’s solar program would receive US$176 million altogether, about US$100 million less than what it received for FY2011.

On the face of it, that type of funding cut could seem ominous for CSP research in the US. But DOE and NREL sources tell CSP Today that the Congressional budgeting process is so far from complete that it is impossible to predict right now how the solar program will end up in 2012.

The next step in the process would be for the Senate to present its own version of a 2012 budget with funding proposed for agencies like the DOE. Both bills would then have to be reconciled into one final piece of legislation, says George Douglas, NREL spokesman. It will likely be a long process between now and October 1.

Déjà vu?

“We’ve had times in the not-too-distant past, during the George W. Bush administration, when whole programs were zeroed out in the House (budget bills), then completely restored in the Senate,” Douglas said.

“This is the first step in a fairly long process in which there is bargaining to be done. So while people may start to get nervous because it looks like there may be a sizable cut (for solar), there is nothing to be done at present, and reacting to it too strongly in either direction can send the wrong signal.”

Within the DOE there has been no indication that the program’s funding for CSP in particular would be cut, or that favor would be given to any one solar technology, said Jesse Gary, technology development manager with the DOE’s solar program.

“We have contingency plans, but right now we’re planning on a flat budget, assuming we’ll have about US$50 million for CSP in 2012, about the same as the 2011 budget,” Gary said.

A lot of factors can determine why certain solar types may get more or less funding in a FY2012 budget for the DOE. Favor for a certain solar power type can come straight from Congress, sometimes from the EERE’s front office, or even from the DOE’s own solar manager, Gary said.

Support remains crucial

Industry leaders say government contracts offer credibility to CSP programs and researchers with potential investors. While there is no evidence yet of cuts, specifically for CSP funding at research centers like NREL and Sandia National Laboratory, if passed they could have a chilling effect on the flow of private money for the sector.  

There’s also no private research center right now that could fill the void in CSP research that would be left if NREL or Sandia’s support were lost, said Jim Kesseli, president of Brayton Energy.

“Private funding may stop coming in, because when government money dries up it scares away the private funding sources,” Kesseli said. “(Private investors) like to work with government-contracted companies, that aspect gives a backbone to the commercial CSP projects. Government sponsorship is instrumental to new research initiatives.”

Potential DOE budget cuts for solar power could set back or shut down projects from countless private companies in the sector, including Massachusetts-based Wilson Solarpower Corp., which was awarded a DOE grant to develop a renewable energy source to aid or replace coal-fired power plants.

The company’s president, Bruce Anderson, met with the DOE and NREL in July to offer progress on his company’s CSP-powered system that he says will produce energy 24 hours per day. “PV will never be able to make that claim, and we’ll produce electricity at a competitive price with coal,” Anderson said. Wilson Solarpower is still in phase one of its project, and relies on DOE funding to move forward.

Anderson worked in the solar energy field in the early 1980s, when President Ronald Reagan “decimated the solar budget when he came into office, all but shutting down the industry,” he said.

“Now we’re suffering from the results of that. Just at a time when CSP is getting off the ground in a real meaningful way, losing this funding would be absolutely destructive,” Anderson said. “CSP is at the top of its learning curve, where the PV industry was a couple decades ago. We’ve seen what could happen to costs for PV with the passage of time and increased production.”

Distributed Generation is your Future

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011

Distributed energy refers to a variety of small, modular power-generating technologies that can be combined with load management and energy storage systems to improve the quality and/or reliability of the electricity supply. They are “distributed” because they are placed at or near the point of energy consumption, unlike traditional “centralized” systems, where electricity is generated at a remotely located, large-scale power plant and then transmitted down power lines to the consumer.

Implementing distributed energy can be as simple as installing a small, stand-alone electricity generator to provide backup power at an electricity consumer’s site. Or it can be a more complex system, highly integrated with the electricity grid and consisting of electricity and thermal generation, energy storage, and energy management systems. Consumers sometimes own the small-scale, on-site power generators, or they may be owned and operated by the utility or a third party.

Distributed energy encompasses a wide range of technologies including wind turbines, solar power, fuel cells, microturbines, reciprocating engines, load reduction technologies, and battery storage systems. The effective use of grid-connected distributed energy resources can also require power electronic interfaces and communications and control devices for efficient dispatch and operation of generating units.

Diesel- and petrol-fueled reciprocating engines are one of the most common distributed energy technologies in use today, especially for standby power applications. However, they create significant pollution (in terms of both emissions and noise) relative to natural-gas- and renewable-fueled generators, and their use is actively discouraged by many municipal governments. As a result, they are subject to severe operational limitations not faced by other distributed generating technologies.

Distributed energy technologies are playing an increasingly important role in the nation’s energy portfolio. They can be used to meet baseload power, peaking power, backup power, remote power, power quality, as well as cooling and heating needs.

Distributed energy also has the potential to mitigate congestion in transmission lines, reduce the impact of electricity price fluctuations, strengthen energy security, and provide greater stability to the electricity grid.

Distributed power generators are small compared with typical central-station power plants and provide unique benefits that are not available from centralized electricity generation. Many of these benefits stem from the fact that the generating units are inherently modular, which makes distributed power highly flexible. It can provide power where it is needed, when it is needed. And because they typically rely on natural gas or renewable resources, the generators can be quieter and less polluting than large power plants, which makes them suitable for on-site installation in some locations.

The use of distributed energy technologies can lead to improved efficiency and lower energy costs, particularly in combined cooling, heating, and power (CHP) applications. CHP systems provide electricity along with hot water, heat for industrial processes, space heating and cooling, refrigeration, and humidity control to improve indoor air quality and comfort.

Grid-connected distributed energy resources also support and strengthen the central-station model of electricity generation, transmission, and distribution. While the central generating plant continues to provide most of the power to the grid, the distributed resources can be used to meet the peak demands of local distribution feeder lines or major customers. Computerized control systems, typically operating over telephone lines, make it possible to operate the distributed generators as dispatchable resources, generating electricity as needed.

The growing popularity of distributed energy is analogous to the historical evolution of computer systems. Whereas we once relied solely on mainframe computers with outlying workstations that had no processing power of their own, we now rely primarily on a small number of powerful servers networked with a larger number of desktop personal computers, all of which help to meet the information processing demands of the end users.

And just as the smaller size and lower cost of computers has enabled individuals to buy and run their own computing power, so the same trend in generating technologies is enabling individual business and residential consumers to purchase and run their own electrical power systems.

For more information, see the distributed energy animation (Download Flash Player) Text Version or pursue the following links:

PCG is able to design an engineered solution for your campus or facility to reflect your onsite generation needs and express that solution in the most financially advantagous solution to fit your situation today and your future.

Call today in order to find out more; 405.447.2977

Plaza’s Future is Looking Brighter

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

Las Vegas Sun

Workers insert light bulbs into the Plaza dome Wednesday, June 22, 2011 as part of the Plaza's $35 million dollar remodel.  There are over 45,000 3-watt light bulbs that are replacing the older 45-watt bulbs.

In the blistering June heat, construction workers stand perched under the iconic dome at the Plaza Hotel, swapping out more than 45,000 light bulbs that light up the downtown Las Vegas casino’s facade. The joke is too obvious, but here’s the answer: It takes two of them, at a rate of about 3,000 a day, over the course of several weeks. But it’s not a punch line. It’s all part of the $35 million renovation at the Plaza and its grand reopening this summer. The workers are swapping out the 45-watt bulbs for 3-watt bulbs to save energy and cut down on costs in leaner times, which is what much of the Plaza renovation has been about.

The property purchased furnishings and fixtures once bound for the never-opened Fontainebleau at bargain prices to update its hotel rooms.

The property got almost everything it needed from Fontainebleau to outfit the new rooms – beds, chairs, accessories, carpeting and marble. The rest of the furnishings ended up at Buffalo Bill’s in Primm for the resort complex’s $8.5 million renovation.

Tony Santo, CEO of PlayLV that runs the Plaza and its sister properties, wouldn’t share the cost of the Fontainebleau deal but said it was “cents on the dollar.”

The result hardly looks like a hotel full of bargain furnishings. The Plaza’s new rooms are sleek and modern with high-end chrome fixtures, new Jacuzzi tubs and marble in the bathrooms. In the bedrooms and sitting rooms, new linens, couches, wall coverings and flooring have been added.

It’s a major improvement for a hotel that has not seen a major renovation in so long that its new operators can’t recall its last update. At least not in the past 20 years, Santo and Chief Marketing Officer Steve Rosen agreed.

“I wouldn’t even call this a renovation. It’s a complete remodel. I think when the Plaza closed, people didn’t believe what we could do. It’s a big investment in the Plaza and a big investment in downtown,” Santo said.

The rooms in the South Tower have been completed, and the North Tower is expected to be finished within the next few weeks. The rooms will reopen to the public Sept. 1 with rates starting at $44.

The new Plaza will be a blend of old and new Las Vegas, with murals and old photos of the hotel in its prime mixed in with the new d≈cor. Preserving the property’s 40-year-old history was something the hotel’s operators kept in mind when redesigning it.

“The whole thing is trying to get the existing customers that were here mixed in with some new customers. We want everyone to feel comfortable,” Rosen said.

They’ll also be adding more lounges and bars to the hotel that go with the new young, relaxed vibe downtown – but without the $300 bottle service Strip casino lounges charge, Rosen said.

“It’s more of a traditional Las Vegas experience downtown, but then you have Fremont East where you have that new generation of customers coming down here,” Santo added.

On the main level of the Plaza, the casino floor has been gutted – taking with it the smell of stale smoke – and is awaiting new slots, table games and a sports book. On the edge of the casino floor, the Plaza will add new food and beverage offerings, but neither Rosen nor Santos were willing to give details.

And everyone is curious what is going in the Plaza’s glass dome overlooking Fremont Street since the restaurant Firefly will not be returning. The hotel’s operators are also keeping those cards close to their vest.

The Plaza is exchanging its Rat Pack show for more updated entertainment, but is leaving the showroom the same. Santo said it’s one of the few Las Vegas showrooms that has remained the same through the decades.

The next challenge will be marketing the new Plaza. Rosen said they’ll be launching a new ad campaign once the renovations are finished, mainly in Las Vegas.

“We wanted to get people while they are here instead of just going out and reaching any individual anywhere,” Rosen said. “That’s really what we want – the people who are coming to Vegas to say ÔHey, there’s a new experience.’”

Oklahoma will have New Energy Efficient Program through CenterPoint Energy

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

HOUSTON - May 4, 2011 - CenterPoint Energy (NYSE:CNP) is introducing energy efficiency program offerings in Oklahoma that will help residential and commercial customers save energy and the environment. The company’s new program includes rebates for efficient water and space heating, and incentives for efficient boilers, boiler components and food service equipment.

Residential and commercial customers can utilize rebates of $125 to $400 per furnace or space heating system and up to $450 for efficient water heating systems. Commercial customers can also receive incentives up to $1,000 for efficient food service equipment and significant rebates for boilers and boiler components.

“By offering these considerable rebates in Oklahoma, we hope to encourage customers to install high-efficiency natural gas equipment in their homes and businesses,” said Richard Leger, Conservation Improvement Program Manager for CenterPoint Energy. “A customer who installs a high-efficiency heating system, a high-efficiency water heater and low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators could reduce their natural gas bill by up to 20 percent-which benefits the consumer and the environment.”

New Residential Energy Efficiency Program Details

  • Water Heater Rebates - CenterPoint Energy customers can receive a $50 rebate for high efficiency natural gas tank systems and a $250 rebate on gas tankless systems. Rebates of $100 and $450 are also available for the replacement of electric water heaters with gas tank or tankless systems. After your home’s air conditioning and heating system, water heating is the second largest energy use and energy expenditure in the home. By replacing inefficient water heaters with efficient gas storage heaters or gas tankless systems, depending on operating conditions, a household can save $61 to $115 a year on utility bills.
  • Heating System Rebates - CenterPoint Energy is providing rebates up to $400 for new high efficiency natural gas heating systems and up to $475 for natural gas heating systems that replace electric heating units. More efficient furnaces can save almost $100 a year on your utility bill. If your furnace is more than 15 years old, it may be time for a replacement.
  • Energy Saving Tips - From caulking windows to programmable thermostats, there are many simple, low-cost or no-cost options for saving energy. CenterPoint Energy customers can download energy saving tips at CenterPointEnergy.com/oklahomarebates or contact us at info@pcgww.com to request more information.

New Commercial Energy Efficiency Program Details

CenterPoint Energy’s commercial customers can enjoy the same water heating and space heating rebates offered to residential customers. In addition, they can take advantage of the following programs:

  • Boiler and Boiler Component Rebates - Energy efficient boilers provide long-term savings on energy bills. CenterPoint rebates can provide thousands of dollars towards natural gas boilers that are 85 percent or more efficient. Rebates are also available for boiler components such as modulating boiler burners, vent dampers and controls.
  • Food Service Rebates - From boilers to fryers, CenterPoint Energy offers rebates of up to $1,000 for a wide variety of food service equipment. Equipment upgrades can help restaurants, cafeterias and schools increase quality, save time and reduce energy costs.

Because of an abundance of natural gas in Oklahoma, customers can enjoy stable, low prices and numerous environmental benefits. All homeowners, businesses and schools served by CenterPoint Energy in Oklahoma are encouraged to take advantage of CenterPoint Energy’s energy saving programs that can lower energy usage, costs and help the environment.

CenterPoint Energy, Inc., headquartered in Houston, Texas, is a domestic energy delivery company that includes electric transmission and distribution, natural gas distribution, competitive natural gas sales and services, interstate pipelines and field services operations. The company serves more than five million metered customers primarily in Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas. Assets total more than $20 billion. With about 8,800 employees, CenterPoint Energy and its predecessor companies have been in business for more than 135 years. For more information, contact our rebate professionals at info@pcgww.com .

PV Grid Integration Solutions

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

   Solar power’s role in the global power generation portfolio is growing year over year largely because solar generation increasingly makes economic sense.

 This burgeoning economic case results from a combination of incentives such as solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) and mandates including renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and because solar solutions—especially when they have smart grid and other functionality built in—can be packaged into profitable business propositions without subsidies. As these forces grow solar power’s prominence, power grids must handle far more photovoltaic (PV) input than before. To accomplish this, solar power and the grid have some growing up to do.

 Large-scale solar power faces significant challenges integrating into the grid. Centralized solar generation, including large PV arrays, or solar farms, can be subject to intermittency. Even in the sunniest climates, clouds inevitably pass over solar farms, resulting in problems such as voltage fluctuations, distribution losses and reduced power quality and power balancing. In the worst case, this can result in lower power reliability for end users, and utilities feel the effect via increased wear and tear on grid hardware: Solar generation can make capacitor banks, breakers, voltage regulators, load tap changers and other power equipment work harder and wear out faster. PV’s potential stress to the grid coincides with pressures from other rapidly developing technologies, such as electric vehicles, which will call for grid upgrades.

 Several opportunities exist to hasten massive PV integration into the grid. Primary among them is highly distributed PV generation because higher degrees of PV distribution deliver a more stable power supply and reduce impact on grid assets. Standard PV inverters are not optimized for interfacing with the grid; maximum PV penetration requires developing the right inverters for the job. Also, PV’s business case can be strengthened by adding value via smart grid and other functionality at generation points. Finally, local, state and federal policies can be designed to promote rather than inhibit PV’s growth.

 Distribution

 Throughout power grid history, the most reliable strategies for providing power have relied on a diverse mix of power generation. In PV’s case, that generation diversity is best manifested through geography. When generation is concentrated in one location, however, local weather such as cloud cover or snow can affect an entire solar power plant’s output. With PV plants reaching 100-MW capacities, local weather can affect enormous amounts of electrical output, potentially impacting local businesses, hospitals, schools and other power consumers.

 As we have seen in Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G)’s ongoing installation of up to 200,000 Petra Solar PV panels throughout New Jersey, when PV is installed as a virtual power plant (VPP) in a highly distributed network, weather risk attenuates. A statewide or regional network of strategically distributed PV generation offers consistent power throughout the network because weather impacting one part of the distribution region is unlikely to affect other parts of it simultaneously.

 Such distribution also has economic benefits. While solar farms achieve some economies of scale, these land-intensive projects can fall victim to regulatory entanglement. Distributed systems, however, can be installed on available public infrastructure such as utility and lighting poles, highway infrastructure, public buildings’ rooftops and publicly owned marginal land. Such installation schemes usually can be implemented faster than solar farm construction, bringing solar power online incrementally throughout an installation project rather than forcing communities to wait for project completion to reap new power. VPPs also provide opportunities to add smart grid functionality, such as power monitoring and conditioning and grid communications, from the distributed points of PV generation.

 Technology

The only way PV generation will integrate with the grid on a large scale is for it to grow up and act like any other power plant. To reach this maturation point, associated technologies, especially inverters, energy storage and weather forecasting, must continue to evolve. Inverters must handle reactive power better so PV can operate in closer proximity to other generators. They must offer better ramp control to mitigate the effects of sunlight loss. Finally, these technologies must offer smart grid functionality such as power conditioning to add to their value and to add value to solar’s business case.

 Once PV generation functions like any other generation source, it will be dispatchable. System operators will be able to request a certain amount of power and know they will receive it. For PV, this will require better and lower-cost energy storage technology and better weather forecasting systems for centralized and distributed generation so system operators can plan more accurately around likely sunshine and resulting power output.

 Cost

 Because recent solar subsidies have a limited lifespan, PV also must present an enhanced business case to utilities if they are to implement solar on a large scale. Ever-cheaper solar panels are only part of making PV more affordable. More important is the ability for PV to build a comprehensive value package of which generation is only a part. Highly distributed PV systems can do this by adding value with smart grid communications, power monitoring, power conditioning and other ancillary services. In these cases, project capital costs may be higher, but with enhanced return on investment overall project payback arrives more quickly and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is lower. Building such a value proposition, which expands beyond power generation alone, has been core to enabling utility executives to implement systems such as integrated PV and smart grid solutions.

 Understanding how peak power usage interplays with PV generation is also critical to maximizing PV’s value proposition. Solar generation holds inherent advantages over wind power because solar’s peak production naturally comes during peak-load use times, commanding higher rates, whereas wind generation tends to produce more at night when power is in lower demand and sells for less. Further, there are ways to maximize solar’s peak-pricing advantage. For example, tilting solar panels slightly to the west can be more profitable because they generate less power overall but produce more power during peak use.

 Finally, distributed systems offer cost advantages because they skirt siting, permitting and other regulatory obstacles that can hamstring centralized solar generation and add greatly to their costs. Because distributed PV generates power close to its point of use, distribution power loss is mitigated and no new distribution or transmission infrastructure, like that for accommodating centralized solar farms, must be built. Because highly distributed PV assets begin feeding power to the grid immediately upon installation, they also offer opportunity cost advantages over large solar projects that might not produce power throughout their multiyear construction.

 Policy

 While PV is maturing beyond the point of total reliance on government incentives, mandates and other policy, smarter standards are required for PV’s integration with the grid. Many standards regulating PV’s interaction with the grid were enacted 20 years ago when PV power production was small and the main objective was to ensure home solar production did not interfere with grid operations. Creating solar virtual power plants in which inverters act within the grid like traditional generation sources requires a refreshed regulatory framework based on today’s technology picture. Energy efficiency policies are critical to solar development; lowering overall energy use eases overall stress on the grid and generation, while allowing PV generation to assume a higher percentage of overall production.

 In coming decades, PV power will make up a substantial part of many local generation portfolios. With maximum distribution of generation, the right inverters, smart business models and realistic policy, we can look forward to welcoming solar power’s clean, reliable contribution to our power supply.

 By Johan Enslin, Petra Solar

NV Dedicates Largest PV Solar Plant in the US

Tuesday, May 31st, 2011

SAN DIEGO, March 18, 2011 – Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, Boulder City Mayor Roger Tobler, Jeff Martin, president and chief executive officer of Sempra Generation, and other dignitaries were on hand today in southern Nevada to officially dedicate Sempra Generation’s Copper Mountain Solar, the largest photovoltaic solar plant in the U.S.

        The 48-megawatt (MW) project is located adjacent to Sempra Generation’s 10-MW El Dorado Solar installation in Boulder City, Nev., about 40 miles southeast of Las Vegas.

        In his comments, Governor Sandoval praised Sempra Generation for its commitment to Nevada and for creating hundreds of local construction jobs to build the solar facility.  He also expressed strong support for the company’s plan, which was recently approved by Boulder City, to expand the Copper Mountain Solar complex by more than 200 MW because of the benefits alternative energy projects bring to the state and local economy.

        “This project exemplifies my goal of making Nevada the renewable energy capital of the country. Projects of this magnitude provide hundreds of jobs and invest millions of dollars in our state,” said Governor Sandoval.

        Recently named “Solar Project of the Year” by Renewable Energy World as part of the 2011 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards, Copper Mountain Solar was selected from hundreds of nominations in the category.

        Construction on Copper Mountain Solar began in January 2010 at the 380-acre desert site.  Nearly 775,000 thin-film photovoltaic solar panels, which convert sunlight directly into electricity, were installed. The award-winning solar facility is now generating enough emission-free electricity to power about 14,000 average homes.
  
        “Copper Mountain Solar represents Sempra Generation’s commitment to developing world-class alternative energy projects that generate a new source of clean power and create jobs,” said Jeffrey W. Martin, president and chief executive officer of Sempra Generation.  “But the success of Copper Mountain Solar can be directly attributed to the vision and support of Boulder City, Pacific Gas & Electric and many state and federal officials in Nevada.  Their leadership is accelerating our country’s transition to a more sustainable energy future.”
 
        The power from Copper Mountain Solar and El Dorado Solar has been sold to Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) under separate 20-year contracts.
  
        Sempra Generation operates and maintains a fleet of clean, efficient natural gas-fueled power plants and is a leading developer of solar and wind facilities that serve U.S. markets.  Sempra Energy, based in San Diego, is a Fortune 500 energy services holding company with 2010 revenues of $9 billion. The Sempra Energy companies’ 13,500 employees serve about 25 million consumers worldwide.

LED Performance Improving

Tuesday, April 26th, 2011

Human nature being what it is, we’re often swayed by the latest and greatest technologies. In lighting, the new wunderkind for the last several years has been light-emitting diode (LED) systems. They have been improving at breakneck speed. Nevertheless, because of the nature of LED systems, they currently work better for certain applications than others. With careful research, facility managers can find solid-state lighting (SSL) solutions that best meet an organization’s needs. But to blindly believe LEDs (or any type of lighting) are a silver bullet might lead to disappointment.

The good news, say experts, is that reports of poor performance are beginning to dwindle, especially as lamps and drivers are increasingly engineered as a single system. Ongoing government testing and the industry’s concurrent push to standardize performance have also helped.

About three years ago, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established its Commercially Available LED Product Evaluation and Reporting (CALiPER) testing program. The tests pit SSL options against conventional lighting sources over the course of several months, evaluating light distribution, photometry and more.

The tests have had variable results. Some recent statistics:

More than half the SSL products subjected to CALiPER long-term testing will not provide 70 percent of initial light output at 50,000 hours and already exhibit significant color shift within the duration of the CALiPER long-term operation.

About one-quarter of the SSL products would not pass a simple 1,000-hour operational test: that is, they do not last as long as a traditional incandescent lamp.

In the other extreme, a few products show negligible lumen depreciation after more than 12,000 hours of operation — demonstrating that the potential for very long SSL product life appears to be achievable.

“CALiPER is a wonderful source of information for those who are considering LED lighting,” says Lindsay Audin, president of Energywiz, Inc. Audin says he regularly uses DOE test results to watch for trends and highlight products that will work best for his clients.

-Loren Snyder, 2.11

Wind Turbines Could Help Crops Thrive

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

The findings are preliminary, but suggestive: researchers from Ames National Laboratory and the University of Colorado have compiled evidence that wind turbines sited on farmlands may actually help certain crops thrive even when weather conditions are less than ideal. If further study does reveal a definite connection, it marks a real turnaround in our approach to energy production, from a high-risk destructive venture to a more moderate activity that can enhance the surrounding environment instead of laying waste to it.

 Fossil Fuels and High-Risk Energy

No matter how you cut it, there are no “bad old days” when it comes to harvesting fossil fuels, because we are living in them right now. In effect, the U.S. is under siege from the inside. Hundreds of mountains in Appalachia are being blown up for coal (a good deal of which is exported, by the way), water supplies are being poisoned for natural gas, and then of course there’s the Gulf oil spill and its aftermath. Clearly this kind of activity is not sustainable over the long run.

Wind Turbines and Crop Growth

The researchers found that wind turbines can create a kind of microclimate by channeling air over the ground. The result is a cooler, dryer environment that could help corn and soybeans avoid fungal infestations. The turbulence could also help crops stay cooler when a heat wave threatens to stunt their growth, and it could help make more carbon dioxide available for photosynthesis.

Wind Farms and Healthy Communities

The new 146-megawatt Farmers City Wind Power Project in Missouri is already proving that wind energy can create new green jobs, enhance the local tax base, and provide new income to local farmers, all without harming water supplies or other vital community resources. If the new research bears out, add a better crop yield to the list of wind energy benefits – and another reason to start leaving the bad old days behind us.

Lighting Retrofits: Evaluating Options

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

The adage that a penny saved is a penny earned can apply to many maintenance and engineering activities, but it is especially true with lighting retrofits. The important question: How much can managers actually save their organizations with lighting retrofits?

The answer depends on the way an organization crunches the numbers. Consider a lighting retrofit that would require a capital investment of $450,000 and result in annual savings of $150,000 in annual energy savings. The simple payback is three years. But with the Commercial Building Tax Deduction and a possible grant from a local utility, the result could be a lower investment with a higher return. What other factors should managers consider in calculating the real cost and benefits of a retrofit? Is it a good investment compared to other options for the same capital investment?

Weighing the Options

Depending on the facility’s age and condition, the lighting upgrade might range from a one-for-one replacement of lamps and ballasts to a complete change-out of lighting equipment. More likely, it will be a combination of the two scenarios. The project also might include adding sophisticated controls, such as occupancy sensors, photocell dimming, or an energy-management system.

Managers should establish all of the project’s goals at the outset. Besides saving energy, the goals might include improving security, enhancing the quality of the illuminated environment and reducing maintenance costs. Managers should weigh each potential retrofit option according to how directly it addresses the established goals.

The obvious goal is to plan the retrofit to go after the low-hanging fruit — the easiest, lowest-cost benefits to achieve. But the low-hanging fruit might not be obvious. For instance, an old office building might have a very rigorous layout of light fixtures on a set spacing throughout the building, regardless of the activity in the space below. The building has T12 lamps — recently relamped with 34-watt, energy-saving versions — and magnetic ballasts, and the plan is to change them out, one-for-one, with T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. If each fixture has two lamps, it would change the input watts from 77 to 66, resulting in a 9 percent energy savings and a 3 percent increase in light output. But is that the best buy for the money?

Further analysis could determine if the space really needs that amount of light. Would less light still be adequate? What about glare control? Do occupants complain that the fluorescent lighting gives them a headache? The culprit might not be the fluorescent source but, instead, the glare from the fixture.

What if each fixture provided less light or if the retrofit changed the fixture entirely to one with better glare control? If plans for a private office called for replacing six fixtures with two lamps each with one fixture using four lamps to improve the quality of light and the light level, would the investment be worth it?

Managers have more than a dozen lamp-and-ballast combinations to consider for T8 replacements alone. Each option includes variables, such as lamp life, light output, lamp quantity, starting characteristics of the lamp — important if automatic controls are a possibility — ballast factor, and cost. To take this scenario one step further, managers also might want to compare a T5 lamp in a fixture designed around the smaller-diameter lamp to achieve greater efficiency and greater visual comfort.